classical logical fallacy explained
T implies p
not p implies not T
but it is incorrect to say
not T implies not p
because you could have been drinking something else...
posted by lumpkin @ 9:08 PM
3 comments
cubins
the adventures of lumpy & lumpkin
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
not p implies not T
but it is incorrect to say
not T implies not p
because you could have been drinking something else...
3 Comments:
mhmmhm, phallacy, mhmmhmhhmm...
Surely, not p does not nescessarily imply not T, as you might be very dehydrated, or the amount of T was very small, ME
that's why logic will only get you part way there, in real life things are more complicated...
Post a Comment
<< Home